However upon examination there was on betting combination on the game in question that could have resulted in that bet size. Jackpot Knights - another operator on the Danguad Limited license - have refused to pay a player based on what they claim in a violation of their maximum bet rule. However, we then checked our own report and found that not only had the player been correct when they asserted that the term had not been in place at the time they played but that the terms document had been updated at the time the change was made to contain a 'Last Updated' date that was significantly before the date of change (the update was made on the 27th of November but the terms document was changed to state that the last update occurred on the 1st of September). In response to this evidence the operator looked to discredit, suggesting that it was not reliable. One of the players in question presented evidence to demonstrate that the term had not been in place at the time they played. Royal Blood Club are part of a network that have engaged in retroactively changing their terms and conditions to restrict a game after two players had significant wins that they did not want to pay.